![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() By John Shaw
Tilt lenses change this relationship somewhat. These are lenses which allow the user to articulate the optics or, in other words, to point the lens in a
Suppose you want to photograph a perfectly flat field of wildflowers from a normal eye-level camera position. With standard equipment you aim the camera down at a slight angle to compose the image, then stop down as far as necessary to achieve front to rear sharpness. Well, in truth there is one and only one area in absolute sharp focus and that is the plane on which you've focused the lens. When you stop down a lens you are making more of the image, some of either side of the plane you've focused on, appear reasonably sharp. There's one plane of true sharp focus, then an area on either side which is "acceptably sharp," and another area both in the front and in the rear where the image is totally out of focus. Depth of field is simply that area on either side of the focused plane that appears to be in "good enough" focus. Let me make a statement right here: there is no lens of any sort that will give you more depth of field. Depth of field depends on the aperture you use and the image size, and only these two things. Tilt/shift lenses do not magically yield more depth of field. What they do is allow you to change the location where the plane of focus falls. You can reposition that plane of focus...and that's the magic of the tilt movement. Let's go back to that field of wildflowers again, with the camera in the exact same position. This time, using a T/S lens, you can pull the entire field (assuming it's perfectly flat) into focus while keeping the lens wide open.
And fighting the wind is one major reason to use the tilt movement with a 35mm camera. Large format shooters have no choice, they have to use lens movements. Why? All lenses of the same focal length, for all film formats, have the same depth of field at the same aperture. Think about that. A 90mm lens on a Canon, a 90mm lens on a Pentax 67, and a 90mm lens on a 4x5 camera all yield the exact same amount of depth of field at any aperture. How much depth of field is there with a 90mm lens used at 16 and focused at 30 feet? Not much. But with 35mm cameras a 90mm is a short telephoto, while with a 4x5 it's a wide angle. In fact, with 4x5 it's roughly the equivalent view of a 28mm on a Nikon or Canon. But that wide angle on the 4x5 camera has the same depth of field at any - stop as a 90mm on the Nikon or Canon. No one would use large format cameras for field photography if they could not also use lens movements, since depth of field is so limited with that film format. Thirty-five millimetre lenses actually offer more depth of field since you can use shorter equivalent focal lengths, while T/S movements allow faster shutter speeds and prime apertures to be used. So are these tilt/shift lenses worth purchasing? That all depends on (a) how much money is burning a hole in your pocket, and (b) how often you truly need such a lens. T/S lenses are not inexpensive; far from it, each one is well over $1000. Canon offers three for the EOS system: a 24mm 3.5, a 45mm 2.8, and a 90mm 2.8. Nikon now has an 85mm 2.8 and there's talk about a shorter focal length coming out this fall. Remember that in the un-tilted mode these lenses perform exactly like any lens of that focal length. For example, if you don't use the tilt movement there is no difference whatsoever between a scene taken with the 24mm T/S Canon and one shot with any other 24mm lens (or a zoom set at
So do you need tilts in your photography? If you're trying to do 35mm view camera pictures, and the appropriate focal length is what you need, then you might consider getting one. But...with small reproductions you will not see any difference in your pictures. Print your image 4 x 6 inches, and you can't tell if you used a tilt movement or not. Go to big prints, or large images from a printing press, and you might want to consider spending all that cash if you do lots and lots of landscape work. If you're primarily interested in wildlife, I would think long and hard before purchasing a tilt lens. Spend the money on another wildlife trip. T/S lenses are also a little fussy to use, particularly the new Nikon version. At best they are slow to operate, absolutely demand tripod use, and must be used with the camera in the manual exposure mode. With both the Nikon and Canon lenses you should meter with the lens in the non-tilted position as any tilt movement, or shift for that matter, will throw off the meter reading with most current camera bodies. (Not true if you're still using an old Nikon F3 or an A2 EOS.) You'll discover this metering discrepancy is most pronounced when taking horizontal compositions. As you tilt in a horizontal orientation, you'll see the meter readout immediately start to show a drop in light. This is caused by the angular relationship between the lens axis and the camera's mirror, not by any
actual decrease in light hitting the film. With vertical work, you can tilt up
to about 5 degrees and still get a correct reading although I would urge you to
meter with no movements used at all. Here's the procedure: compose your final
picture, then read off the amount of tilt you're using on the degree scale on
the lens. Reset the lens back to the zero position, meter and set your exposure
don't touch that focusing ring while you're doing this then retilt back to
the correct mark and make your exposure. Nikon 85mm PC owners, you have to take
a few more steps. You will not get correct exposure values if you meter with the
lens stopped down or, according to my tests but contrary to Nikon's
instructions, with the lens absolutely wide open. I've had my best results
metering with the lens set at 4, one stop down from wide open. Make sure you
have the aperture plunger depressed so that the lens is actually stopped down.
Now count off stops to the aperture you want to use, and adjust the shutter
speed this same number of stops.Tilt/shift lenses are certainly not for everyone. They are special purpose, costly lenses but they give the 35mm photographer the closest approach there is to a 35mm view camera. So my final question is simple. Is that your type of photography? Questions and Answers John Shaw will answer readers' questions in his bi-monthly column regarding equipment and photography techniques in the field. He can be contacted via e-mail at this address: johnshaw@photosafaris.com. Due to the anticipated volume of inquiries John cannot answer questions individually, but he will cover a wide range of topics within each column. The new columns will come on-line May 1, July 1 and September 1. We look forward to hearing from you. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Joseph Van Os Photo Safaris, Inc. P.O. Box 655, Vashon Island, Washington USA 98070 Phone: (206) 463-5383 Fax: (206) 463-5484 Email: info@photosafaris.com Copyright © 2008, Joseph Van Os Photo Safaris, Inc. |