|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]()
While that may seem to be the obvious answer, putting that answer into practice is not so easy with many species. Even in national parks, some species, or some individual animals, may be more wary and less tolerant of the humans nearby. In other areas, where wildlife has less contact with man, non-habituated wildlife may be quite intolerant, quickly taking cover or flying to safety at the first sign of people.
In protected areas, however, it is a different story. One of the best places to photograph whitetail deer in the United States is (or at least was) Kensington Park, a city park/refuge on the outskirts of Detroit where picnickers feed them. While these tame deer may not be wild, and may not be part of the most satisfying wilderness experience youll ever have, these deer do make for some great shots. Indeed, some of the big trophy bucks sporting the pages of hunting magazines are often made in protected suburban developments where deer thrive, and hunting is prohibited. Regardless of where you photograph wildlife, your personal approach and method may make all the difference in getting close enough to make an outstanding image. Even in national parks, most animals shy away from a photographer making a direct approach, and may bolt at a sudden, unexpected appearance. In areas where game is tame whether thats a Florida beach for shorebirds or a mountain meadow in Yellowstone we avoid walking directly toward a potential subject.
With some animals, a photographers upright figure almost always poses a threat. For these wary subjects were apt to drop down to a low position, even onto our bellies, to attempt to draw ourselves closer. Once, on the Patagonian coast of southern Argentina, I belly-crawled between a herd of huge elephant seals to make my way closer to a shy group of southern sea lions. While there was some risk involved, since a big elephant seal can caterpillar across the sand both quickly and silently, this approach allowed me to get close enough to the wary sea lions for some great images. There were times when my feet and one of the elephant seals hind flippers were touching. Id definitely not advocate anyone following in my footsteps here -- or my belly trail -- but this anecdote illustrates how, with a low profile and a slow approach, I could pass through a group of animals that would have stampeded to the water had I been standing erect.
When youre close enough to your subject that your movements might spook your quarry, it is critically important that you move very, very slowly. Whenever I change camera positions, focus, change film, or contend with a particularly bothersome biting fly, I move in slow motion. I keep my gear or film close enough to me so that changing a lens or changing film requires very little movement. If I have to shift positions, I do so in slow-motion stages. Remember, close-up wildlife photography is a relative term, and getting close to a subject dictates some form of common sense. In many national parks, some naive park visitors apparently dont realize that a close-up photograph of an elk, moose or bear theyve seen in the park gift shop was made from a safe distance and using a long telephoto lens. Unknowingly, theyll try walking up close enough to a large and dangerous mammal to get that same shot with a point-and-shoot camera. In doing so, theyre putting themselves in harms way, and probably stressing the wildlife. This naturally drives the park rangers crazy and increases their misgivings about all photographers pros included. For many species you absolutely have to consider the type of animal you are photographing as well as calculating your working distance and selection of lens length. Common sense constantly tells us not to attempt to get close to a Yellowstone grizzly on foot, dont try wide-angle shots on bison in the middle of the prairie, and dont ... well, you get the picture.
In areas where there are no regulated distance limits, closeness becomes a matter of personal discretion. While great images are often indeed close-ups, you should never get so close that you are either putting yourself in harms way or you are stressing your subject. Pushing an animal until it runs off or takes flight, shows incredible insensitivity to your subject. Likewise, Ive seen photographers who have worked very hard to get close to an animal just stand up and walk away when theyre finished shooting, even though theyre now at their closest working distance! Invariably, this abrupt change in position and speed of movement frightens the animal the very animal that had trusted you and permitted you within its zone of comfort. Worse yet, on African safaris Ive seen photographers ask their guides to spook the perched eagles or other birds they had been filming up close, as they wanted to get a flight shot. What a lack of respect! The bird had allowed their close presence, and they repay this trust by purposefully frightening it when they were finished.
When you are privileged enough to be accepted by wildlife to work in their close proximity, your presence should never affect their behavior or cause them stress. As you move in close enough for your lenses to do their job, remember your subjects welfare always comes first. Nothing pleases Mary and me more than spending several intimate hours with a wildlife subject and, when we leave, to do so with the animals at ease and undisturbed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Joseph Van Os Photo Safaris, Inc. P.O. Box 655, Vashon Island, Washington USA 98070 Phone: (206) 463-5383 Fax: (206) 463-5484 Email: info@photosafaris.com Copyright © 2008, Joseph Van Os Photo Safaris, Inc. |